10
$\begingroup$

I am trying to find the integral $$ \int^{1}_{0} \frac{\mathrm{W} \left( -x\log x\right) }{-x\log x} \mathrm{d} x=\frac{\pi^{2} }{12} $$

By expanding the Lambert W-Function into a series, one obtains said result.

I am trying to find a solution using integration techniques, besides from a series expansion.

I attempted Feynman‘s trick but this is messy and I got stuck. I appreciate any help.

$$ I(a) = \int_0^1 \frac{\mathrm{W}(-a x \log x)}{-x \log x} \, dx $$ $$ I'(a) = \frac{d}{da} \int_0^1 \frac{\mathrm{W}(-a x \log x)}{-x \log x} \, dx = \int_0^1 \mathrm{W}'(-a x \log x) \, dx $$

$$ \mathrm{W}'(z) = \frac{1}{z (1 + \mathrm{W}(z))} \implies \mathrm{W}'(-a x \log x) = \frac{1}{-a x \log x (1 + \mathrm{W}(-a x \log x))} $$

$$ I'(a) =\int_0^1 \frac{1}{a}\frac{1}{-x \log x (1 + \mathrm{W}(-a x \log x))} dx $$

A solution with Feynman seems convoluted, to be honest.

Motivation: I was wondering about the infinite power tower - I really like the solution below but I would prefer one using no series expansion

https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3539090

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @jjagmath okay, I will phrase it more precisely. I would appreciate a solution using no series expansion. $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    Commented yesterday
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A small correction: $W'(z)=\frac{W(z)}{z(1+W(z))}$. $\endgroup$ Commented 22 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Completely avoiding series expansion is implausible -- most manipulation of $W$ (see the DLMF: Lambert $W$-Function) is through its series. $\endgroup$ Commented 19 hours ago

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Over $(0,1)$ the function $-x\log x$ is increasing over $I_1=(0,e^{-1}]$ and decreasing over $I_2=[e^{-1},1)$. The same applies to the function $W(-x \log x)$. The inverse function of $-x\log x$ over $I_1$ is $\frac{-z}{W_{-1}(-z)}$. The solution of $-x\log x=z$ with $x\in I_2$ is $\frac{-z}{W(-z)}$.

$$ \mathcal{J}_1=\int_{I_1}\frac{W(-x\log x)}{-x\log x}\,dx = \int_{0}^{e^{-1}}\frac{W(z)}{z}\cdot \frac{-1}{1+W_{-1}(-z)}\,dz $$

$$\mathcal{J}_2=\int_{I_2}\frac{W(-x\log x)}{-x\log x}\,dx = \int_{e^{-1}}^{0}\frac{W(z)}{z}\cdot \frac{-1}{1+W(-z)}\,dz.\tag{1}$$

so the original integral equals

$$ \mathcal{J}_1+\mathcal{J}_2=\int_{0}^{e^{-1}}\frac{W(z)}{z}\left(\frac{1}{1+W(-z)}-\frac{1}{1+W_{-1}(-z)}\right)\,dz.\tag{2}$$

By letting $z=-ue^u$ with $u$ ranging from $-1$ to $0$ we get

$$ \mathcal{J}_2 =\int_{-1}^{0}\frac{W(-ue^u)}{-u}\,du = \int_{0}^{1}\frac{W(ve^{-v})}{v}\,dv$$

and by letting $z=-ue^u$ with $u$ ranging from $-\infty$ to $-1$ we get

$$ \mathcal{J}_1 = \int_{-\infty}^{-1}\frac{W(-ue^u)}{-u}\,du = \int_{1}^{+\infty}\frac{W(ve^{-v})}{v}\,dv $$

hence

$$ \mathcal{J}_1+\mathcal{J}_2 = \int_{0}^{+\infty}W(v e^{-v})\frac{dv}{v} \tag{3}$$

where $ve^{-v}\in\left(0,e^{-1}\right]$ as $v$ ranges over $\mathbb{R}^+$. Now we may circumvent the usage of the exact coefficients of the power series of $W(x)$ by just saying that they exist and they are fixed by the Lagrange-Burmann inversion theorem. Assuming

$$ W(z) = \sum_{n\geq 0} c_n z^n $$

we have that $c_0=0$, and the radius of convergence of this power series equals $e^{-1}$, such that

$$ \int_{0}^{+\infty}W(v e^{-v})\frac{dv}{v} = \sum_{n\geq 1}c_n \int_{0}^{+\infty} v^{n-1} e^{-nv}\,dv = \sum_{n\geq 1}c_n \frac{n!}{n^{n+1}}.\tag{4}$$

By the residue theorem

$$ c_n = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{\|z\|=\varepsilon} \frac{W(z)}{z^{n+1}}\,dz$$

and the map sending $z$ to $ze^z$ deforms $\|z\|=\varepsilon$ into an homotopic curve, such that

$$ c_n = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{\|z\|=\varepsilon} \frac{W(z e^z)}{(ze^z)^{n+1}}(z+1)e^z\,dz = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{\|z\|=\varepsilon}\frac{(z+1)e^{-nz}}{z^n}\,dz,$$

$$ c_n = [z^{n-2}]e^{-nz}+ [z^{n-1}]e^{-nz} = n^{n-2} [z^{n-2}] e^{-z} + n^{n-1} [z^{n-1}] e^{-z}. \tag{5}$$

If we coordinate $(4)$ and $(5)$ we get

$$ \mathcal{J}_1+\mathcal{J}_2 = 1+\sum_{n\geq 2}\frac{n^{n-2}(-1)^{n-2}n!}{(n-2)!n^{n+1}}+\frac{n^{n-1}(-1)^{n-1}n!}{(n-1)!n^{n+1}}\tag{6}$$

and the claim follows by massive cancellation.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ This is impressive. How did you learn this? Can you provide readers or books that taught you? $\endgroup$
    – Samuel
    Commented 20 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Samuel: any classical textbook on Complex Analysis should cover the basics. You can find a "Lagrange inversion theorem in a nutshell" here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2741644/… $\endgroup$ Commented 19 hours ago
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is still a series in this answer? $\endgroup$ Commented 18 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.