2
$\begingroup$

In The Volatility Smile book by Derman & Miller at pag. 113, I don't understand the statistical uncertainty in the measurements of volatility and how to interpret the notation.

The authors state that the volatility of the hedging error is, approximately,

$$ \sigma_{HE} \approx \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt n}\frac{\partial C}{\partial \sigma} $$

Then to interpret it, they write:

Suppose we measure the volatility of one lognormal stock process by taking n discrete measurements of the price. The statistical uncertainty in the measurement of the volality estimate is $d\sigma=\sigma/\sqrt n$. [...]

My questions:

  1. How can I link the "differential" $d\sigma$ to the statistical uncertainty?
  2. How can I calculate it? Is it simply related to the fact that $E[r_i^2]=\sigma^2$ and to estimated to variance one takes the averages of the n squared log-returns $r_i$ and then you calculate the variance of the variance?

Maybe my doubts are trivial or due to a lack of understanding the notation. I don't know.

Please, let me know if further details are needed. Thanks for your help.

Edit: possible answers to be checked

Assuming $r_i$ to be zero mean and with $\sigma^2$ variance log-returns.

  1. $\sigma$ is a constast in the usual BSM setting. So, if we are estimating it, how much could this costant move by? It could move by its estimation error.

  2. An estimate of the variance (square of volatility) could be $\bar \sigma^2 = n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}r_i^2$. Its expected value is $\sigma^2$ and its variance (measurement error) is $\sigma^2/n$ Thus, without taking in consideration the Jensen effect, the measurement error of the volatility is the square root of $\sigma^2/n$, that is $\sigma/\sqrt n$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you are spot on in your edits. It's probably that they used a $d\sigma$ instead of $\delta\sigma$. Also if I remember correctly, the standard error of the estimator of the standard deviation of a population based on a finite sample of size N is rather $\bar{\sigma}/\sqrt{2n}$, but I think they are using the approx you mention. $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented 2 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for having checked! $\endgroup$
    – Enrico
    Commented 2 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that this error only covers part of the hedging error, in practice, most is due to fat tails and the fact that squared returned are not independent (although returns have zero correlation). I strongly recommend section 1.2 of Lorenzo Bergomi's excellent book freely available here: lorenzobergomi.com/_files/ugd/…. Actually, he mentions on p.11 (along with how to properly calculate it): 'the relative standard deviation of the volatility estimator $\hat{\sigma}$ is approximately half of this, that is $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2N}}$' $\endgroup$
    – Quantuple
    Commented 2 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ Great reference: cool to see different authors approach the same topic in different ways. I'm struggling a little bit to understand why its half of the reported ratio of pag. 11, maybe I have to review again my calculations. $\endgroup$
    – Enrico
    Commented 1 hour ago

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.