The New Builder Revolution (Won’t Be Televised)
Software creation is changing. Counterintuitively, the next wave of innovation probably won’t come from where you expect.
A Quiet Start
Not every major shift announces itself. Sometimes change builds slowly, in the background, before most people realize what has happened. Today, AI is starting to reshape how software is built. The tools are spreading beyond traditional developers, lowering barriers and making it possible for more people to create working digital products.
At first glance, this shift is easy to dismiss. The workflows feel unfamiliar. The early outputs seem rough. But like past shifts in technology, the real change happens well before it looks polished.
A New Class of Builders Is Emerging
AI is expanding the circle of who can build functional software. New builders are emerging from adjacent fields like design, product management, and operations. Some are coming from entirely different backgrounds. They’re using AI tools to generate code, refine it, and ship real applications. They may not follow traditional development workflows, but they are solving real problems and delivering real products.
In many ways, they behave more like digital creators than engineers. They move quickly, iterate openly, and focus less on writing perfect code and more on achieving real outcomes.
There are two early signs that a real shift is underway: first, the reaction of the old guard; and second, the speed at which tool innovation is outpacing institutional adoption.
1. The Old Guard Is Reacting Predictably
Every time technology shifts, those most invested in the old ways react with skepticism. When cloud storage first appeared, storage engineers dismissed S3 as unreliable. When EC2 launched, many IT leaders said it might be useful for development work but would never be trusted for production. Today, as AI-assisted development grows, traditional engineers often respond in much the same way. They label it “vibe coding” and question its seriousness.
These concerns shouldn’t be dismissed outright — they often reflect deep knowledge about stability, scalability, and security. But similar resistance has accompanied every major shift in computing. Historically, the louder the skepticism, the more profound the change tends to be.
2. Tool Velocity Is Outrunning Institutions
The second indicator is the pace of tool innovation. AI tools are improving faster than institutions can evaluate, integrate, or absorb them. Every few months, new models, frameworks, and assistants appear — each expanding what individuals can accomplish. Organizations, built around slower cycles of evaluation and adoption, are falling behind.
When technology moves faster than institutions can adapt, advantage shifts. The newcomers — unburdened by legacy systems and process — are often better positioned to act.
Innovation Will Come from Unexpected Places
The most successful organizations in this new era won’t necessarily be the largest or the best known. They’ll be the ones that recognize change early and move without friction. They’ll have enough experience to understand where older methods still matter — but enough flexibility to abandon them when better options appear. They’ll avoid being trapped by process for its own sake. They’ll focus on outcomes over orthodoxy.
This is not a new pattern. Amazon built AWS before “cloud computing” was even a noun — simply because it identified an internal need and moved without waiting for external validation. The teams that succeed now will share that same DNA: pragmatic, unencumbered, and willing to rethink what building looks like.
Skills and Mindsets Are Evolving
The skill set required to succeed is changing. Deep technical knowledge remains important, but it is no longer the only path to meaningful contribution. Skills like problem framing, judgment, iteration speed, and the ability to steer AI tools are becoming just as essential.
Building effective software now looks less like crafting every detail by hand and more like shaping and refining through fast feedback loops. The comparison to early YouTube is instructive: the most successful creators weren’t the ones with the best cameras or editing tools, but those who understood how to work with the medium as it evolved.
The same is happening with software. Teams that can experiment rapidly, respond to feedback, and discard failing ideas without friction will move faster than those tied to traditional rhythms. Playfulness — in the sense of low-cost experimentation and resilience to failure — is becoming a competitive advantage.
This Isn’t a Zero-Sum Shift
This isn’t a binary handoff where traditional developers are replaced by AI-assisted newcomers. Instead, a spectrum is emerging, with innovation happening across the full range of contributors.
Traditional software development is experiencing its own renaissance — powered by tools like Warp, Claude Code, Q Chat, and GitHub Copilot X. These tools aren’t replacing expertise — they’re amplifying it. Debugging is faster. Documentation is easier. Complex implementations are more efficient. Developers are integrating AI into their workflows, becoming dramatically more productive while maintaining professional standards.
At the same time, product managers, designers, and domain experts are using AI to build solutions that once required dedicated engineering teams. The result isn’t substitution — it’s expansion. More people building. More ideas shipped. More creative and technical leverage across the board.
While some predict AI will reduce the need for developers, history suggests otherwise. When creation becomes more accessible, we don’t see fewer creators — we see more creation, more specialization, and more innovation.
Software Is Becoming a Creative Medium
Software development is no longer just a technical exercise. It’s becoming more fluid, expressive, and collaborative. Lower barriers to entry are pulling more people into the act of building. The cost of trying new ideas is dropping. Entirely new categories of digital products and workflows are starting to emerge.
And the shift is happening not just at the tool level, but at the platform level too. Canva Code, launched recently, is a striking example — a visual, drag-and-drop environment where anyone can assemble real software experiences without writing traditional code. It points to a future where digital creation is as accessible — and as creatively open-ended — as building a presentation or editing a video.
The change mirrors what happened with photography when smartphones put cameras in everyone’s hands: not just better pictures, but new genres, new habits, and new forms of expression. Software is following the same path.
The Future Is Already Being Built
The new builders are not waiting for approval. They’re using the tools available now, moving quickly, and learning in public. Their work doesn’t always look familiar or polished — but history suggests that by the time these changes are widely recognized, the landscape will already have shifted.
For organizations navigating this moment, the way forward isn’t wholesale replacement — it’s thoughtful integration. The most successful will:
- Identify where AI amplification delivers the most immediate value
- Create space for experimentation outside traditional workflows
- Build bridges between old and new approaches
- Focus relentlessly on outcomes, not methods
The key insight isn’t that traditional development is going away — it’s that the surface area of who can build, and what they can build, is expanding dramatically. The organizations that thrive will embrace both the rigor of established practices and the possibility of new approaches.
The revolution won’t happen overnight, and it won’t erase what came before. But those who recognize the shift — and lean into it with clarity and intent — will help define what comes next.
The revolution won’t be televised. But it’s already underway.
Founder @ Omnigres
3wMatt, On the old guard's reaction: They didn't label it "vibe coding". Andrej Karpathy did. There are a few things to unpack here: Engineers have questioned new technologies, as they should, and we can't say they were completely wrong. Many of their concerns from 20 years ago are still valid today, partially masked by the grandiose success of the fantastic sales machines and the narratives they use. Some of their concerns, while valid at the time, have turned out to be non-issues. Great. Process as it is expected to be. Engineers and technology leaders argue about engineering solutions, whether on engineering merit, social, or organizational. However, AI-generated software is not a new software architecture or product. It's a mind-blowing pattern matcher and synthesizer. We can't argue about it on its engineering merit – there is none, so we argue about its output (variable and unpredictable) and impact on the field (skill atrophy, elimination of growth path) Here's an interesting thing. The skepticism isn't loud. If you listen, most everywhere, AI is met with enthusiasm and embraced amongst both engineers and non-engineers. Does it tell us anything about the profoundness of the change?
Business Development Analyst | AI Enthusiast | ALX Student on AWS Cloud Practitioner | I help you streamline operations | Own a Youtube channel INSIGHTVOX WITH CEE-Y
2mo"Focus relentlessly on outcomes, not methods" This is my new slogan 😊 Thank you Matt for this
Senior GenAI Program Manager at Amazon Web Services
2moJuan M. R.
Digital Product Engineering Leader
2moThanks Matt Wood, great perspective. Our industry too often views AI in polarized terms — either as a threat that takes away opportunity and risks upending the development world, or as a tool customers are frantically onboarding to 'adopt or perish'. Reframing code AI as an opportunity for faster innovation, experimentation, and scaled development (with less pain) — seems to fit the ad hoc adoption patterns I'm seeing so far.
Technology, Product, and Solutions Leader | 25+ Years Scaling Startups and Enterprise Innovation | Launched multiple AWS Services | Led FINRA’s Big Data Cloud Migration | Building Scalable, High-Impact Software
2moMatt Wood love this, I believe this shift, like others before it (think compilers from assembly for programming) have potential to create more opportunity as it broadens the funnel of who can participate. The shift to "digital creator" economy has potential to make it more about battle of ideas than who is deeply trained in c++ programming, ultimately great for innovation.