How Computers Learned to Speak: A Clear Look at the Magic Behind LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT or Claude can now answer questions, summarize documents, write code, and even simulate conversation with eerie fluency. But if you’re not a data scientist or AI engineer, you might wonder: How exactly did computers learn to use language like this? And why now, after decades of clunky chatbots and robotic voices?
The answer starts with one simple idea: meaning isn’t stored in words - it’s stored in relationships.
Let me explain.
Step One: From Rules to Patterns
For years, computer scientists tried to teach machines to understand language using hard-coded rules - think: “if the sentence contains the word buy, then it might be about a purchase.” It was rigid, brittle, and failed at anything subtle. Human language is full of nuance, slang, double meanings, and implied context. You can’t just write a rule for every case.
The breakthrough came when researchers stopped trying to teach language explicitly and instead started teaching it implicitly - by having machines look at massive amounts of text and figure things out statistically.
Step Two: Word Vectors – Teaching Machines Meaning Through Math
Enter the concept of word vectors. Instead of treating words as fixed symbols (like dictionary entries), computers began assigning them positions in a multi-dimensional space - a kind of map - based on how they appear in context.
Think about the words king, queen, man, and woman. In a good word vector model, the relationship between king and queen is almost identical to the one between man and woman. The model doesn’t "understand" these words like we do, but it sees patterns and associations through mathematical relationships.
This map of relationships is learned by reading billions of lines of text. It’s like watching someone learn a new language by immersion - they don’t memorize grammar rules, they just start to “get it” by exposure.
Step Three: Context is Everything – The Rise of Transformers
Early word models had one big limitation: they could only understand a word in isolation or in a fixed window of surrounding words. That’s like trying to understand a movie by looking at three frames out of order.
In 2017, Google researchers introduced a model called Transformer, and everything changed.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Transformers allowed models to pay attention to every part of a sentence at once, so the model could decide what parts of a sentence matter most for understanding a word or phrase. This is how LLMs today understand that “bank” can mean a riverbank or a financial institution, depending on context.
This architecture became the foundation of modern LLMs like GPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer).
Step Four: Training the Giants
Once the architecture was figured out, researchers started feeding these models everything: books, articles, Wikipedia, open forums, technical manuals, and more. They trained them to predict the next word in a sentence, over and over, millions and billions of times.
That might sound simple, but it’s incredibly powerful. By trying to guess what comes next in a sentence, the model learns grammar, facts, reasoning, and even tone. It doesn’t memorize everything, it generalizes patterns across language.
Step Five: Fine-Tuning and Guardrails
After the base model is trained, companies fine-tune it for specific tasks or industries. Want a medical assistant? Train it on medical data. Want a chatbot? Teach it to stay on topic and sound helpful.
Developers also add filters and ethical guardrails to limit harmful content and correct hallucinations (false answers). It’s not perfect, but it’s improving fast.
Why It Matters
LLMs are now helping with customer service, software development, research, legal work, and more. But their power is best understood not as “machines that think,” but as machines that complete patterns across language. They don’t understand meaning like we do, but they model it mathematically with astonishing accuracy.
If your organization isn’t already exploring how to use LLMs, now is the time to get serious. The tech is moving fast, but the core ideas - statistics, vectors, and contextual learning - are surprisingly human.
Because, in the end, teaching a computer to use language wasn’t about giving it rules. It was about giving them experience.
Call me @mckinsey, Im board 🥱🫶
1moGood point C. J. Garbo, M.Sc. 1.720.689.3275 My lab is turning computed magnitude into patterns of movement and direction in a 3D space, using fractal-inspired calculations to spread these patterns natrally. Think of it like organizing scattered pieces of a puzzle into neat clusters, then converting those into a 3D map of their strengths and directions. What makes my approach stand out is how it trains multiple versions of the same model at the same timeto collect a wider variety of insights from the data. By using advanced geometry and relationships between data points, it prepares the information in a way that’s perfect for a “MOE” system. My lab's repository focuses on Dissapation sampling of diffusion of an incursion within fractal edges derived from a cumulative centroid for the structure of the feature. The centroids magnitude extracted eigenvalue is implemented based upon a vertex mask in plural model instances to distribute reference quickly. This way we have reference in both initialization and activation. The results are applied as an n calculated embedded feature and the curvature is applied to the outer most vertex to augment activation. Cdascientist https://discord.com/channels/702624558536065165/1373816106975756431