Dual Encoder Models for Search: Encodes both queries and documents independently for fast, scalable retrieval

The original piece of content is taken from this reference URL of ThatWare's Blog Section as follows: https://thatware.co/dual-encoder-models-for-search/

This project implements a scalable and efficient dense retrieval system using dual encoder models to enhance semantic search capabilities within SEO content. The system uses two separately trained encoders—one for processing user queries and another for content blocks—enabling independent representation and fast similarity-based retrieval.

The pipeline extracts and cleans content from multiple URLs, encodes both the queries and content blocks into dense vectors, and retrieves top-matching content segments based on semantic similarity. This approach enables accurate identification of relevant information across web pages and supports better content-query alignment. The results are structured for clarity and can be exported for further SEO review or integration.

Project Purpose

The purpose of this project is to improve semantic retrieval of web content for SEO-focused use cases by using a dual encoder architecture. Traditional keyword-based search systems often fall short in understanding the meaning behind user queries, especially when queries are phrased differently from the content on the page. This project addresses that gap by leveraging transformer-based models that embed both queries and content blocks into a shared vector space, enabling semantic-level comparisons rather than relying on keyword overlap.

The project enables retrieval of the most contextually relevant content segments from a diverse set of webpages. It is specifically designed to assist in SEO tasks such as content optimization, intent alignment, and enhancing the discoverability of web pages by ensuring that critical blocks of information can be surfaced based on their semantic fit with user intent.

By supporting independent encoding of queries and documents, the system offers high scalability, fast retrieval, and flexibility in updating content without reprocessing the entire dataset.

Project’s Key Topics Explanation and Understanding

Dual Encoder Models

A dual encoder architecture uses two separate transformer-based encoders—one for user queries and another for content documents or blocks. Each encoder is trained to produce embeddings that reside in the same semantic vector space, allowing meaningful similarity comparisons using methods such as dot product or cosine similarity.

In this project:

• facebook-dpr-question_encoder is used to encode the queries.
• facebook-dpr-ctx_encoder is used to encode the content blocks.

These models are trained with question-answering data, which enables the system to align real user queries with meaningful responses found in content, even when phrasing differs.

Independent Encoding of Queries and Documents

A key advantage of the dual encoder architecture is that both queries and documents are encoded independently. This separation allows for:

• Offline preprocessing of content: Content blocks can be encoded and stored in advance.
• Real-time query processing: At inference time, only the query needs to be encoded and compared to precomputed document vectors.

This independent encoding mechanism is central to achieving scalable and responsive search performance, especially when dealing with large sets of SEO content.

Fast and Scalable Retrieval

To support fast retrieval from thousands of content blocks, the project integrates FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search) — a high-performance library optimized for efficient similarity search over large-scale vector datasets.

Key aspects:

• Embeddings are normalized and indexed once for fast inner product comparisons.
• Query vectors are matched against the index to retrieve the top-k most similar content blocks.
• Retrieval is done in real time with minimal latency, even across multiple pages.

This enables SEO analysts to process and evaluate large volumes of web content with speed and consistency, which is essential for enterprise-level optimization tasks.

Semantic Relevance Beyond Keyword Matching

Unlike traditional systems that rely on lexical overlap, this approach supports semantic-level matching:

• Allows queries to retrieve conceptually relevant passages, even without direct keyword overlap.
• Improves alignment between search intent and content, especially important in SEO content audits, FAQ generation, and topic clustering.

This capability ensures that high-value content is discoverable based on meaning, not just surface terms.

Q&A Section: Understanding Project Value and Importance

Why is this dual encoder system more effective than keyword-based search for SEO content?

Keyword-based systems often struggle when queries are phrased differently from the way content is written, even if they are semantically related. This project solves that issue by using dual encoder models trained on semantic relevance rather than keyword frequency. The encoders learn to represent both queries and content blocks in the same vector space, allowing retrieval based on meaning rather than exact terms. This leads to more accurate and useful results, especially in SEO where user phrasing is unpredictable and diverse.

For example, a query like ”optimize image indexing for SEO” may retrieve content mentioning ”preferred image URL via HTTP headers”, even if those exact words aren’t used in the query. Such alignment significantly enhances content visibility and search intent matching.

What makes this system scalable for large websites or domains with many pages?

The architecture of this system separates query encoding from document encoding. Content from multiple URLs is preprocessed and encoded in advance, and those vectors are stored in a FAISS index. During live usage, only the query needs to be encoded and compared against this index. This avoids repeated reprocessing of content and supports fast retrieval across thousands of blocks.

The separation allows new queries to be handled efficiently without modifying the content index, making the system suitable for large SEO projects that involve frequent re-querying or updating content across a growing set of web pages.

How does this system improve SEO analysis and decision-making?

This system allows SEO professionals to:

• Pinpoint which blocks of content best answer specific user intents.
• Identify semantic gaps where content might exist but does not align well with key queries.
• Compare multiple URLs simultaneously to evaluate which pages best respond to targeted queries.

By retrieving the most contextually relevant segments from across a set of pages, the system surfaces strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities within the content structure—supporting data-backed decisions for rewriting, updating, or optimizing specific sections.

Can this project be used in ongoing SEO monitoring and audits?

Yes. Once the content index is built, the same infrastructure can be used repeatedly with updated query lists for ongoing audits. New user queries can be introduced at any time, and results can be reviewed instantly using the existing FAISS index. Export options also allow integration with internal workflows or external reporting tools.

This flexibility makes the system suitable not just for one-time evaluations, but also for recurring SEO quality checks, relevance audits, and performance reviews.

You’re right to raise that. Four questions provide a strong foundation, but expanding the section with a few more high-value, practical, and insightful questions can enhance the client’s understanding of the full project potential. Additional questions should highlight other dimensions such as integration, flexibility, adaptability, and team usage.

How does this support SEO content planning for new keywords or topics?

When introducing new target keywords or topics into a content strategy, this system can test whether existing content already addresses those topics semantically. By running new queries through the model, it becomes clear which pages already align and where there are gaps.

This supports proactive SEO planning by identifying under-optimized themes, ensuring new content efforts are directed toward areas that add the most value. The dual encoder structure ensures meaningful comparisons, even when content is phrased differently from the target keywords.

Libraries Used

requests

• A widely adopted HTTP client library for Python, used to make reliable and configurable web requests.
• It fetches the raw HTML content from input URLs. Custom headers and timeout controls ensure resilient network communication when retrieving live content from client sites or third-party pages.

bs4 (BeautifulSoup) and Comment

• BeautifulSoup is a powerful HTML and XML parsing library that allows for easy navigation, searching, and modification of the parse tree.
• It parses HTML and extracts relevant content blocks such as paragraphs, headings, and list items. It also removes irrelevant content such as scripts, hidden elements, navigation links, and boilerplate elements to ensure clean input for downstream processing.

hashlib

• A standard Python library used for cryptographic hashing.
• It generates deterministic UUIDs based on content block text. This allows block-level deduplication and traceability even if the same content appears in multiple places.

numpy

• A fundamental library for numerical computing in Python, supporting multi-dimensional arrays and mathematical operations.
• It handles embedding vector operations including stacking, normalization (for FAISS inner product search), and transformation of model outputs into structured data formats. It also supports efficient handling of FAISS index data.

re (Regular Expressions)

• A built-in Python module for pattern matching and substitution in strings.
• It cleans and formats web content during preprocessing. This includes removing boilerplate phrases (e.g., “click here”, “read more”), unwanted punctuation patterns, numbered or bulleted prefixes, and embedded URLs—ensuring the cleanest possible text input to the encoder.

html and unicodedata

• Standard libraries used to decode HTML entities and normalize Unicode characters in text.
• These libraries are used to process special symbols, smart quotes, non-breaking spaces, and encoded characters found in raw HTML, improving input uniformity and model compatibility.

csv

• A standard library for reading and writing CSV files.
• It is used to export the top-k retrieval results into structured tabular format. This enables clients to archive, share, or further analyze the semantic search results outside the system, especially in existing SEO audit workflows.

transformers.utils.logging

• A utility from the transformers library to configure logging verbosity and suppress unnecessary model loading output.
• It suppresses verbose console logs during model loading and inference to ensure a cleaner user experience, especially when operating in automated or UI-facing environments.

sentence_transformers

• A library built on top of HuggingFace Transformers that simplifies training and usage of models for producing semantically meaningful sentence embeddings.
• It loads and runs both encoders in the dual encoder architecture—one for queries and one for content blocks. The SentenceTransformer interface supports batching, device management (CPU/GPU), and output formatting for use with FAISS.

torch

• The deep learning framework powering PyTorch models.
• It enables device configuration and ensures that the model operates efficiently by automatically detecting GPU availability when encoding queries or documents.

faiss

• Facebook AI Similarity Search (FAISS) is a high-speed vector similarity search library optimized for large-scale dense embedding retrieval.
• It builds and manages the retrieval index of all content block embeddings. This allows fast inner-product search across potentially thousands of pre-encoded content blocks, enabling real-time retrieval of top-matching passages for each user query.

Function: extract_content_blocks

Overview

This function is responsible for retrieving and segmenting the visible content from a webpage into clean, self-contained content blocks. Each block is suitable for independent semantic encoding and similarity comparison. The output is structured in a {url: [blocks]} format, where each block is a plain text snippet extracted from meaningful HTML elements such as paragraphs, headers, or list items.

This function is the first stage of the retrieval pipeline and is designed to ensure only relevant, human-readable content is retained for downstream encoding. It also handles network resilience, deduplication, and document structure cleanliness.

Code Explanation

·         response = requests.get(…) Fetches the webpage using a user-agent header and a configurable timeout. Ensures proper request handling, which is important when crawling live or client-managed sites.

·         soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, “html.parser”) Parses the raw HTML into a navigable tree structure that enables tag-level extraction.

·         page_title = soup.find(“title”)… Extracts the page title if available. Though not used in the current output, it’s preserved for optional metadata enrichment in later stages.

·         Tag Cleanup Loops (soup.find_all / decompose) Removes all layout, script, and hidden elements that do not contribute meaningful content. This eliminates noise such as navigation bars, cookie banners, and embedded media.

·         if len(text.split()) < min_word_count: Filters out extremely short blocks that do not meet the minimum semantic length. This ensures only meaningful blocks are passed forward for embedding.

·         hashlib.md5(norm_text.encode()).hexdigest() Deduplicates content using normalized text hashing. This avoids scoring duplicate blocks or cluttering the retrieval index.

·         blocks.append(text) Collects clean, deduplicated, and filtered blocks in sequence. The returned dictionary maps the original URL to this list of meaningful content snippets.

·         return {url: blocks} Returns a dictionary with the URL as key and its list of valid content blocks as the value. This structure supports batch processing of multiple URLs and efficient block management.

Browse Full Article Here: https://thatware.co/dual-encoder-models-for-search/