Hmm.. very rare, but very powerful dispute in industry. 1. If the content is licensed, be sure you involve the licensors in every important decision related to content. 2. Avoid quality related issues from starting. 3. Be sure about the contract and deals you are making with licensors related to profits, usage, and timelines from initial phases.

Flexible and willing to compromise: Be flexible in approach and willing to compromise if possible, to achieve the best interests of both parties without compromising too much on your own interests. Build personal relationships: Try to build a good relationship with the parties involved. Have a personal relationship, negotiations can be more open and easier. Learn about your counterpart's culture and negotiating style: If counterpart comes from a different culture or has a different working style, take the time to get to know them. Identify the ultimate decision maker and stakeholders: Make sure negotiating with the right people who have the power to make decisions. Otherwise, may waste time without achieving results.

Licensor disputes classic tug-of-war. First, don’t let it turn into a shouting match; keep it professional. Understand their concerns fully and show you’re listening, nothing defuses tension like actually hearing the other side. Then, come armed with data: player feedback, usage stats, revenue projections, whatever proves the content’s value. Position yourself as a partner, not an adversary, focusing on shared goals. And if all else fails, remind them the game’s success benefits both sides. No one wins a broken deal.

Step up the age verification on the game database . And up the requirements from the parental controls. And the games should venture to less options when decisions are made based on violet acts and not makeing mature decisions based on game play. And allowing them to advance in the games should be based on al phycology and intervention around there decisions the make during game play.