To ensure everyone's voice is heard when prioritizing research findings, create an open and structured discussion framework. Begin by presenting all findings transparently, ensuring team members have equal access to the data. Use collaborative tools like affinity mapping or voting systems to identify key themes and areas of agreement. Facilitate discussions where each member can share their perspective, emphasizing active listening and respect for differing opinions. Apply prioritization techniques, such as the MoSCoW method or impact-effort matrices, to guide decision-making objectively. Summarize and document the agreed priorities, ensuring everyone feels their input was valued in reaching the final decision.

I often use Lightning Decision Jams to get everyone's opinion given and understood. The Blind Vote technique at the end ensures that there is collective agreement and accountability on the outcome. Sometimes the primary stakeholder will have the final say, but at least this way they have all the information and opinions of the team when doing so, and everyone feels heard.

In this instance, a meeting will be held so that everyone can discuss their findings. Additionally, all of the team members' insights will be documented, and they will be asked to highlight the most significant influence on the user. Then, in order to keep myself in line with the project's goals, I will make sure that the study findings are significant enough to assess things like must-have, should-have, could-have, and won't-have. The project manager will be given the final decision-making authority if the discussion continues. To keep the team on course, the document will be shared with them once everything is finished.