Sign in to view more content

Create your free account or sign in to continue your search

Welcome back

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

New to LinkedIn? Join now

or

New to LinkedIn? Join now

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
LinkedIn
  • Top Content
  • People
  • Learning
  • Jobs
  • Games
Join now Sign in
Last updated on Apr 6, 2025
  1. All
  2. Manufacturing
  3. Quality Assurance

QA keeps finding recurring bugs in a developer's code. How do you manage their frustration?

When QA keeps finding the same bugs in a developer's code, it's essential to tackle the root cause and improve collaboration. Here are some strategies to help manage frustration and enhance code quality:

  • Conduct code reviews: Regularly review code to catch issues early and improve overall quality.

  • Implement automated testing: Use tools to identify bugs before they reach QA, reducing manual testing effort.

  • Foster open communication: Encourage regular check-ins and feedback sessions to address concerns promptly.

How do you handle recurring bugs in your team? Share your strategies.

Quality Assurance Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

+ Follow
Last updated on Apr 6, 2025
  1. All
  2. Manufacturing
  3. Quality Assurance

QA keeps finding recurring bugs in a developer's code. How do you manage their frustration?

When QA keeps finding the same bugs in a developer's code, it's essential to tackle the root cause and improve collaboration. Here are some strategies to help manage frustration and enhance code quality:

  • Conduct code reviews: Regularly review code to catch issues early and improve overall quality.

  • Implement automated testing: Use tools to identify bugs before they reach QA, reducing manual testing effort.

  • Foster open communication: Encourage regular check-ins and feedback sessions to address concerns promptly.

How do you handle recurring bugs in your team? Share your strategies.

Add your perspective
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
14 answers
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Rohita Sharma

    Test Lead| AWS Cloud Certified| ETL Expert| ISTQB CTFL Certified| LinkedIn Top Voice- Quality Assurance & Cloud Computing| Microsoft Certified : Azure Data Fundamentals | Microsoft Certified : Azure AI Fundamentals

    • Report contribution

    - Start by recognizing the QA team's contribution. Let them know their vigilance is crucial, and finding recurring bugs isn't a failure — it's their commitment to quality. - Introduce a short weekly “Bug Reflection” meeting where QA and Devs collaborate to look at recurring bugs — not to point fingers but to understand:Why the bug reappears, What part of the process failed,What can be improved (coding standards, communication, documentation) - When a recurring bug finally stops showing up, celebrate it in a team channel. Small shout-outs build motivation - If bugs are truly repetitive, create simple automated checks or smart checklists to speed up the process. It saves their time and makes the task less annoying.

    Like
    4
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Jill Evans CSM® PMP®

    Senior Advisor | Project | Program |Process | ScrumMaster | PMO | Infrastructure| Datacenter| ERP | Transformation | Technical Consultant | Trainer

    • Report contribution

    Need more context. Are the bugs recorded, corrected, regression tested and the root cause addressed?How were the corrections done? Were there version control?

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Rick Motta

    Global Agile Strategy Architect | Scaled Frameworks | People-First Team Builder

    • Report contribution

    My Agile project looked off, so I pulled 6 months of Jira data. For every One user story, there were 2 QA defects and 1 regression bug. Surprisingly, 33% of new defects were canceled as “not a bug.” That was the aha moment, we were Agile in name but still running waterfall, with long waits, siloed vendors, and no shared ownership. QA was like a right-fielder in Little League, just waiting for a ball, no engagement. Testers didn’t grasp the business goal, so bugs didn’t align. Devs didn’t know how they’d be tested. The fix? Move test left. Co-estimate stories, separate dev/test estimates, and work as one team. Scrum isn’t a waterfall disguise, it's a team sport. Stop pretending a pool of 200 interchangeable resources makes a scrum team.

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Muhammad Hamaad

    Penetration Tester | Web3 Security Researcher

    • Report contribution

    To effectively address recurring bugs in a developer's code, it's crucial to focus on continuous improvement, clear communication, and preventive practices. One practical solution is implementing peer code reviews combined with unit testing, which helps catch issues early and promotes shared ownership of code quality. For example, introducing a "buddy system" where developers review each other's code before merging can significantly reduce repeat errors and improve collaboration. Open dialogue between QA and development teams also fosters a proactive, solutions-focused environment, turning frustration into actionable progress.

    Like
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Abdul Majeed

    I am free lancer and a goal-oriented person who is passionate about what I do and dedicated to delivering high-quality results within the shortest time!

    • Report contribution

    In my experience to manage a developer’s frustration over recurring bugs, prioritize empathy and collaboration. - Acknowledge their effort to validate their work while framing feedback as a shared goal: improving product quality. - Facilitate open dialogue between QA and the developer to identify root causes—misunderstood requirements, knowledge gaps, or process flaws. Use recurring issues as learning opportunities: - organize pair programming sessions, code reviews, or workshops to address skill gaps. - Implement automated testing for repetitive bugs and create checklists to prevent oversight. - Foster a blameless culture by focusing on systemic fixes (e.g., clearer documentation, better tools) rather than individual blame.

    Like
View more answers
Quality Assurance Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

+ Follow

Rate this article

We created this article with the help of AI. What do you think of it?
It’s great It’s not so great

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.

Tell us more

Report this article

More articles on Quality Assurance

No more previous content
  • You're facing conflicting viewpoints on test results in QA. How do you bridge the gap with your colleagues?

    25 contributions

  • You're facing quality discrepancies in your project's lifecycle. How can you ensure consistency throughout?

    17 contributions

  • You're facing end-user demands during product updates. How do you balance their expectations and feedback?

    7 contributions

  • You're faced with requests for expedited testing. How do you maintain quality assurance standards?

    8 contributions

  • You're debating quality standards with a client. How do you ensure both parties are satisfied?

    16 contributions

  • You're faced with uncertain user impact in test cases. How do you prioritize effectively?

    13 contributions

  • You're faced with a stakeholder misinterpreting your QA report. How can you clarify and prevent confusion?

    17 contributions

  • Your QA team's concerns are often overlooked by developers. How can you ensure they are taken seriously?

    12 contributions

  • Your project hits a critical delivery phase with unexpected workload spikes. How do you ensure quality?

    14 contributions

  • You're faced with conflicting feedback from end-users. How do you navigate improving your product's feature?

    14 contributions

No more next content
See all

More relevant reading

  • Quality Assurance
    What do you do if developers and stakeholders are not on the same page?
  • Quality Assurance
    You're facing conflicting test results with a developer. How do you navigate the Quality Assurance challenge?
  • Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC)
    What are the best practices for coordinating and communicating with different test level teams?
  • Quality Assurance
    Here's how you can assess your performance in QA by focusing on key metrics.

Explore Other Skills

  • Warehouse Operations
  • Manufacturing Operations
  • Lean Manufacturing
  • Plant Operations
  • Transportation Management
  • Logistics Management
  • Quality Management
  • Product R&D
  • Supplier Sourcing
  • Process Design

Are you sure you want to delete your contribution?

Are you sure you want to delete your reply?

  • LinkedIn © 2025
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your California Privacy Choices
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Policy
  • Brand Policy
  • Guest Controls
  • Community Guidelines
Like
2
14 Contributions