I usually gather all perspectives, weigh the pros and cons of each, consider our specific needs and constraints, and then make an informed decision that I believe best suits the team and project goals.

Even if the opinions conflict, the intent should to be common i.e., making a robust, secure and performant system. In my experience, sometimes lack of common intent arise majorly due to differences around the speed of delivery. Open communication around the choices and reasons behind those choices should be the first step towards consensus. One other thing I can suggest from my experience is dividing the system integration and delivery in phases. This will make the process more measurable and delivery can be tracked better.

🗣️ Encourage Open Dialogue: Facilitated discussions where all team members could share their perspectives, creating a space where concerns and ideas were openly considered. 📊 Rely on Data-Driven Decisions: Used objective metrics to evaluate system options, focusing on performance, compatibility, and scalability to steer the decision away from personal preferences. 🚀 Pilot Before Full Rollout: Tested potential systems on a small scale, gathering real feedback and assessing impact, which allowed us to make informed adjustments before full implementation. 🔄 Focus on Shared Goals: Aligned the team around common objectives, ensuring everyone understood how the chosen integration would support both team goals and business outcomes.

Yes, I have. Even with conflicting opinions, I encouraged open discussions that cut across all technical disciplines. I always apply a systems engineer approach, where focusing on overall organizational/project goals is a priority, and individual opinions are coalesced to optimize the goal. Doing a deep dive into each approach will chart a better course for integration. Secondly, data-driven strategic approaches have been critical because they have helped analyze and refine the best way forward for effective implementation.

Las opiniones contradictorias son oportunidades de mejorar el planteamiento de la integración o, al menos, sí saber trasladar mejor al equipo el objetivo, causas, consecuencias... Es importante que ese consenso exista, que se comprendan las limitaciones y las múltiples interacciones que tiene la integración o conjunto de integraciones.