Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 15
    Not the Science sites either. With few exceptions where the fields are very closely linked to computers (e.g. Bioinformatics or Theoretical Computer Science) most of the science sites have nothing to do with "technology" (whatever that exceedingly broad term even means).
    – terdon
    Commented Jul 10 at 14:48
  • 1
    Well put, I think. Technology as a word is probably broad enough to encompass the whole network (see my comment here), but I wouldn’t say that’s regular usage nor helpful here. Commented Jul 10 at 16:56
  • 7
    The way I explained it was "sites based on data, facts, and science", and the way Joel explained it was "sites that can be documented in a reference book" which is a bit more broad, but also true. Commented Jul 10 at 18:06
  • 4
    @JeffAtwood Didn't someone once liken the sites to colleges or departments at a university? I swear that was in an early blog post or podcast that I can't find now. Or maybe I just made that up in my head. Commented Jul 11 at 10:20
  • 2
    @ThomasOwens that sounds like something Joel would have said, and I do agree with it. Commented Jul 12 at 17:35
  • Mechanics.SE would fall in this realm as well ... not served. Commented 2 days ago