Timeline for Flag window redux: proposed syntax
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26 at 23:19 | answer | added | CPlus | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 26 at 18:37 | vote | accept | Machavity | ||
| Jun 26 at 18:36 | answer | added | Bella_BlueStaffMod | timeline score: 20 | |
| Jun 26 at 18:34 | history | edited | Bella_BlueStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| S Feb 5, 2024 at 1:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 5, 2024 at 1:06 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 27, 2024 at 23:34 | history | bounty started | Karl Knechtel | ||
| S Jan 27, 2024 at 23:34 | history | notice added | Karl Knechtel | Draw attention | |
| Jan 27, 2024 at 23:28 | answer | added | Karl Knechtel | timeline score: 6 | |
| S Dec 18, 2022 at 0:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Dec 18, 2022 at 0:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 22:34 | history | bounty started | TylerH | ||
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 22:34 | history | notice added | TylerH | Draw attention | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 22:19 | history | edited | Journeyman GeekMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 15:33 | history | edited | SpevacusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Future-proof'd the statement wrt triage as the terminology was later made clear with some review updates, introduced "Key changes" as a header and downgraded subsequent headers by a tier
|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 9:17 | comment | added | user692942 | Perhaps "Request delete as spam" and "Request delete as rude or abusive"? | |
| S May 29, 2021 at 0:03 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 29, 2021 at 0:03 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 20, 2021 at 22:07 | history | bounty started | curiousdannii | ||
| S May 20, 2021 at 22:07 | history | notice added | curiousdannii | Draw attention | |
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 17, 2020 at 20:16 | comment | added | VLAZ | @CodyGray I know that's what it requests, but I dislike the wording. When I pick the flag "deleted for spam" it sounds like I'm flagging it because it is deleted. Yes, it makes sense if you read the text before but then you have to go back and read it in order to make sense of the flag text. Simply making it "delete as spam" makes it immediately clear what the flag would lead to. | |
| Apr 17, 2020 at 20:13 | comment | added | Cody Gray | Oh man. I love this. Please implement ASAP! It needs to say "deleted", @VLAZ, because that's what the flags request. | |
| Apr 17, 2020 at 19:21 | comment | added | VLAZ | As a separate thing, I'd really like the duplicate to not say "closed as duplicate". Yes, you basically get the same thing - blue box, can't be answered, the whole thing. However, I have a dream that one day curators and question askers would be able to join hands as sisters brothers and both agree that a duplicate is not a bad thing. To do that, we really need duplicates to be marked as other than "closure" because, honestly they sort of aren't. I consider duplicate marking an answer. Being in the same category as "cannot be answered" and "should not be answered" is very odd. | |
| Apr 17, 2020 at 19:19 | comment | added | VLAZ | I think the wording should be slightly altered (I don't like "deleted" - makes parsing the result of the flag harder) but otherwise solid suggestion. | |
| Apr 14, 2020 at 23:13 | history | edited | curiousdannii |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 14, 2020 at 16:48 | history | asked | Machavity | CC BY-SA 4.0 |