Skip to main content
Active reading. [<http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Dax90QyXgI&t=17m54s> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Dax90QyXgI&t=19m05s>].
Source Link

It isn't. StackOverflowStack Overflow captured so many good questions/answers, so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that, unless people start actively deleting their content from this site, the company is fine.

EDIT as @FrédéricHamidi pointed out that, there is a limit on how many posts you can delete, so my second point is not a practical option.

It isn't. StackOverflow captured so many good questions/answers so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that unless people start actively deleting their content from this site company is fine.

EDIT as @FrédéricHamidi pointed out that there is a limit on how many posts you can delete, so my second point is not practical option.

It isn't. Stack Overflow captured so many good questions/answers, so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that, unless people start actively deleting their content from this site, the company is fine.

EDIT as @FrédéricHamidi pointed out, there is a limit on how many posts you can delete, so my second point is not a practical option.

added 143 characters in body
Source Link
talex
  • 1.1k
  • 9
  • 10

It isn't. StackOverflow captured so many good questions/answers so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that unless people start actively deleting their content from this site company is fine.

EDIT as @FrédéricHamidi pointed out that there is a limit on how many posts you can delete, so my second point is not practical option.

It isn't. StackOverflow captured so many good questions/answers so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that unless people start actively deleting their content from this site company is fine.

It isn't. StackOverflow captured so many good questions/answers so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that unless people start actively deleting their content from this site company is fine.

EDIT as @FrédéricHamidi pointed out that there is a limit on how many posts you can delete, so my second point is not practical option.

Source Link
talex
  • 1.1k
  • 9
  • 10

It isn't. StackOverflow captured so many good questions/answers so it can survive without community contribution at all.

Which means that unless people start actively deleting their content from this site company is fine.