Skip to main content
deleted 20 characters in body
Source Link
user102937
user102937

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

  • Questions about the new CoC

  • Questions about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

  • Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

  • Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

  • Questions about what content can go into a user profile

  • Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

  • Questions about the new CoC

  • Questions about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

  • Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

  • Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

  • Questions about what content can go into a user profile

  • Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

  • Questions about the new CoC

  • Questions about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

  • Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

  • Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes

  • Questions about what content can go into a user profile

  • Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

Questions about the new CoC

Question about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

Questions about what content can go into a user profile

Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

  • Questions about the new CoC

  • Questions about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

  • Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

  • Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

  • Questions about what content can go into a user profile

  • Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

Questions about the new CoC

Question about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

Questions about what content can go into a user profile

Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

  • Questions about the new CoC

  • Questions about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

  • Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

  • Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

  • Questions about what content can go into a user profile

  • Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

Active reading.
Source Link

How wide/narrow does SE consider activities related to Monica?

How wide/narrow does SE consider activities related to Monica?

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

Questions about the new CoC

Question about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

Questions about what content can go into a user profile

Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

How wide/narrow does SE consider activities related to Monica

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

Questions about the new CoC

Question about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

Questions about what content can go into a user profile

Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

How wide/narrow does SE consider activities related to Monica?

In this answer an SE employee has told us that

Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. We will not be answering any questions or comments about that going forward.

This was on a question that did not have a clear scope. The title was focused on links (not sure where) and community ads while the message body also included profiles but seemed to narrow the scope to Monica's situation.

Some questions that I am not clear on is if SE considers the following to be part of Monica's situation:

Questions about the new CoC

Question about the new moderator removal and reinstatement procedures

Questions about the new policy regarding SE making public statements about moderators and users

Questions about the change in reputation for question upvotes change in reputation

Questions about what content can go into a user profile

Questions about what types of community ads are appropriate

I hope that SE's interpretation is not that they will not respond to questions about the new policies that have seemingly resulted from what they are calling Monica's situation (which should probably be more accurately described as SE's incompetence).

Source Link
StrongBad
  • 5.9k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 37
Loading