Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 6
    I can't agree with that because "bad" is not a line that you cross. They may have legitimate upvotes, speckled in with abuse. I just know I spent my own time contributing to the community answering those questions and I have never even considered "voter fraud", yet I'm being punished for some jerks abuse of this site. And for some reason, it seems to be getting a lot worse lately, I believe I lost at least 50 rep just this week.
    – kmb385
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 19:38
  • 1
    @kmb386: The current version (throwing away ALL the user's votes) is much worse. So, what CAN you agree with? Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 21:38
  • 2
    I'm right there with you I want to keep the rep. If your going to put the effort into investigating what votes were legitimate, punish the cohorts by removing their votes, not legitimate upvotes. I hope this comment did not seem disrespectful, it was not intended to.
    – kmb385
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 22:08
  • @kmb385: I didn't think it was disrespectful at all. I was just looking for ways to improve the idea, and I didn't see anything like that. Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 22:14