Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 1
    One other piece of advice I was given was to list them as "Work in Other Areas" as they at least perfunctorily are in a different area than the rest of my papers. Both of the papers are on arxiv, so even removing my name from the published version might raise questions why my name is on the arxiv version.
    – GQ25
    Commented yesterday
  • 2
    Even if people do not make assumptions about omission of papers, the fact that they were omitted may actually serve to draw more attention to them, simply because someone is trying to work out if they are actually yours or not.
    – avid
    Commented yesterday
  • 1
    Footnotes and such explanations draw attention to topics you do not want to have attention on. Explanations and excuses are difficult to tell apart. I would not do so.
    – usr1234567
    Commented yesterday
  • 4
    If you have published enough papers in total, you can list a subset of them in the CV and call the list a list of your most important/ impactful/ etc papers. In such situation no one will look for the missing papers or think ill of you if they happen to find a paper not listed on your CV. But this approach requires a lot of papers and at the stage where people look for permanent positions most people don't have that many.
    – quarague
    Commented yesterday
  • @quarague what do you mean "no one will look for the missing papers"? I can tell you that whenever I sit on a hiring committee and examine reasonable applicants, I spend more time looking at the list of their paper on MathSciNet than at the list of publications they provided. Commented 2 hours ago